Abstract
Summary The in-hospital spread of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) is aimed to allow for a shock-delivery within three minutes. However, it has to be questioned if the implementation of AED alone really contributes to a ‘heart-safe hospital’. Methods Cohort study of 1008 in-hospital emergency calls in a university tertiary care hospital. Analysis of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) cases with and without AED use. Results A number of 484 patients (48%) had cardiac arrest and received CPR. Response time of the emergency team was 4.3 ± 4.0 minutes. 8% percent of the CPR cases had a shockable rhythm. In only three cases of 43 placements a shock was delivered by the AED. There were no differences in survival between patients with CPR only and CPR with AED use. Conclusion Our data do not support the use of an AED for in-hospital CPR if a professional response team is rapidly available.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
