Abstract

Neuroimaging classification procedures between normal and pathological subjects are sparse and highly dependent of an expert's clinical criterion. Here, we aimed to investigate whether possible brain structural network differences in the shiverer mouse mutant, a relevant animal model of myelin related diseases, can reflect intrinsic individual brain properties that allow the automatic discrimination between the shiverer and normal subjects. Common structural networks properties between shiverer (C3Fe.SWV Mbpshi/Mbpshi, n = 6) and background control (C3HeB.FeJ, n = 6) mice are estimated and compared by means of three diffusion weighted MRI (DW-MRI) fiber tractography algorithms and a graph framework. Firstly, we found that brain networks of control group are significantly more clustered, modularized, efficient and optimized than those of the shiverer group, which presented significantly increased characteristic path length. These results are in line with previous structural/functional complex brain networks analysis that have revealed topologic differences and brain network randomization associated to specific states of human brain pathology. In addition, by means of network measures spatial representations and discrimination analysis, we show that it is possible to classify with high accuracy to which group each subject belongs, providing also a probability value of being a normal or shiverer subject as an individual anatomical classifier. The obtained correct predictions (e.g., around 91.6–100%) and clear spatial subdivisions between control and shiverer mice, suggest that there might exist specific network subspaces corresponding to specific brain disorders, supporting also the point of view that complex brain network analyses constitutes promising tools in the future creation of interpretable imaging biomarkers.

Highlights

  • Complex brain network analysis, in which the brain is modeled as a graph whose nodes represent structural/ functional regions and the links between them represent anatomical or functional connections, provide us with topological measurements that could be interpreted in terms of the management and integration of the nervous information flow and physiological brain dynamics

  • From the obtained whole brain axonal trajectories (Figure 1b), weighted networks were created for the whole brain (Figure 1c), in which each node represents an anatomic brain region (150 gray matter regions in total), arcs connecting nodes correspond to white matter links, and arc weights correspond to the degree of evidence supporting the existence of a effective white matter connection between regions

  • Normal/Shiverer network measures deviation For these whole brain networks, six different topological properties were evaluated: clustering (C, a measure of the inherent tendency to cluster nodes into strictly connected neighbourhoods), characteristic path length (L, the average number of region-region direct connections that must be traversed to go from one region to another), modularity (Q, the degree to which a network may be subdivided into subnetwork modules with a maximum number of internal links and a minimum number of external links), global efficiency (Eglob, a measure of how much parallel information can be potentially exchanged over a network), local efficiency (Eloc, the average global efficiency of the local subnetworks) and smallworldness (s, a measure of how optimally is organized a network)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In which the brain is modeled as a graph whose nodes (or vertices) represent structural/ functional regions and the links (or edges) between them represent anatomical or functional connections, provide us with topological measurements that could be interpreted in terms of the management and integration of the nervous information flow and physiological brain dynamics. Despite of the demonstrated usefulness of DW-MRI techniques to detect anomalies [32,33,34,35,36,37,38], to date, brain network analyses based on DW-MRI tractography techniques have been more devoted to describe the brain organizational principles described above [15,17,18,39,40,41,42] than to the study of specific brain pathologies [5,9,43], limiting its potential applications to the quantitative description and understanding of specific brain disorders, something with a possible practical outcome for clinical diagnosing

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call