Abstract
AbstractFor more than 50 years, humans have been using model- and data-based support systems in decision making with the hope that system supported decisions are not only better, but also more objective and fairer (i.e. more efficient and less biased). With data-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, this hope is revived. AI systems are to support physicians in diagnosing illnesses, or assist managers when recruiting personnel. Furthermore, AI systems could even replace humans when deciding whether or not applicants receive a loan, an insurance policy or can lease a car. Even governments and public institutions are already making use of such automated decision systems including such diverse applications as setting bail in legal proceedings, risk assessment in youth welfare services or eligibility for state assistance to the unemployed and access to health services. The results of the current applications of automated decision systems are, however problematic. In this essay I examine the question of how automated decision systems impact the autonomy of humans and what requirements are to be placed on automated decision systems in order to protect individuals and society.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
