Abstract

The shape and position of a neuron convey information regarding its molecular and functional identity. The identification of cell types from structure, a classic method, relies on the time-consuming step of arbor tracing. However, as genetic tools and imaging methods make data-driven approaches to neuronal circuit analysis feasible, the need for automated processing increases. Here, we first establish that mouse retinal ganglion cell types can be as precise about distributing their arbor volumes across the inner plexiform layer as they are about distributing the skeletons of the arbors. Then, we describe an automated approach to computing the spatial distribution of the dendritic arbors, or arbor density, with respect to a global depth coordinate based on this observation. Our method involves three-dimensional reconstruction of neuronal arbors by a supervised machine learning algorithm, post-processing of the enhanced stacks to remove somata and isolate the neuron of interest, and registration of neurons to each other using automatically detected arbors of the starburst amacrine interneurons as fiducial markers. In principle, this method could be generalizable to other structures of the CNS, provided that they allow sparse labeling of the cells and contain a reliable axis of spatial reference.

Highlights

  • The classification of neuronal types is far from complete

  • Electron microscopy is not yet capable of either obtaining large enough sample sets to capture the biological variability within individual cell types, or imaging cells with very large neuronal arbors

  • Identifying and providing experimental access to homogeneous cell types of nervous systems is a prerequisite to understanding the fundamental principles of brain function in health and disease

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The classification of neuronal types is far from complete. The need for structural information has not diminished because what defines a true neuronal type is not clear when only molecular information is available. One challenge facing a successful classification is to ensure that every cell type is represented in the sample set. Dense reconstruction of tissues imaged by electron microscopy offers a solution to this completeness problem (Denk and Horstmann, 2004; Hayworth et al, 2006; Bock et al, 2011). Electron microscopy is not yet capable of either obtaining large enough sample sets to capture the biological variability within individual cell types, or imaging cells with very large neuronal arbors. Light microscopy offers high throughput imaging and a large field of view to complement electron microscopy. The time-intensive tracing step represents a bottleneck of the overall program

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call