Abstract
Terrestrial auroras are highly structured that visualize the perturbations of energetic particles and electromagnetic fields in Earth’s space environments. However, the identification of auroral morphologies is often subjective, which results in confusion in the community. Automated tools are highly valuable in the classification of auroral structures. Both CNNs (convolutional neural networks) and transformer models based on the self-attention mechanism in deep learning are capable of extracting features from images. In this study, we applied multiple algorithms in the classification of auroral structures and performed a comparison on their performances. Trans-former and ConvNeXt models were firstly used in the analysis of auroras in this study. The results show that the ConvNeXt model can have the highest accuracy of 98.5% among all of the applied algorithms. This study provides a direct comparison of deep learning tools on the application of classifying auroral structures and shows promising capability, clearly demonstrating that auto-mated tools can help to minimize the bias in future auroral studies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.