Abstract

The number of fluorophores within a molecule complex can be revealed by single-molecule photobleaching imaging. A widely applied strategy to analyze intensity traces over time is the quantification of photobleaching step counts. However, several factors can limit and bias the detection of photobleaching steps, including noise, high numbers of fluorophores, and the possibility that several photobleaching events occur almost simultaneously. In this study, we propose a new approach, to our knowledge, to determine the fluorophore number that correlates the intensity decay of a population of molecule complexes with the decay of the number of visible complexes. We validated our approach using single and fourfold Atto-labeled DNA strands. As an example we estimated the subunit stoichiometry of soluble CD95L using GFP fusion proteins. To assess the precision of our method we performed in silico experiments showing that the estimates are not biased for experimentally observed intensity fluctuations and that the relative precision remains constant with increasing number of fluorophores. In case of fractional fluorescent labeling, our simulations predicted that the fluorophore number estimate corresponds to the product of the true fluorophore number with the labeling fraction. Our method, denoted by spot number and intensity correlation (SONIC), is fully automated, robust to noise, and does not require the counting of photobleaching events.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.