Abstract

Structural dynamics of calcified cartilage (CC) are poorly understood. Conventionally, CC structure is analyzed using histological sections. Micro‐computed tomography (µCT) allows for three‐dimensional (3D) imaging of mineralized tissues; however, the segmentation between bone and mineralized cartilage is challenging. Here, we present state‐of‐the‐art deep learning segmentation for µCT images to assess 3D CC morphology. The sample includes 16 knees from 12 New Zealand White rabbits dissected into osteochondral samples from six anatomical regions: lateral and medial femoral condyles, lateral and medial tibial plateaus, femoral groove, and patella (n = 96). The samples were imaged with µCT and processed for conventional histology. Manually segmented CC from the images was used to train segmentation models with different encoder–decoder architectures. The models with the greatest out‐of‐fold evaluation Dice score were selected. CC thickness was compared across 24 regions, co‐registered between the imaging modalities using Pearson correlation and Bland–Altman analyses. Finally, the anatomical CC thickness variation was assessed via a Linear Mixed Model analysis. The best segmentation models yielded average Dice of 0.891 and 0.807 for histology and µCT segmentation, respectively. The correlation between the co‐registered regions was strong (r = 0.897, bias = 21.9 µm, standard deviation = 21.5 µm). Finally, both methods could separate the CC thickness between the patella, femoral, and tibial regions (p < 0.001). As a conclusion, the proposed µCT analysis allows for ex vivo 3D assessment of CC morphology. We demonstrated the biomedical relevance of the method by quantifying CC thickness in different anatomical regions with a varying mean thickness. CC was thickest in the patella and thinnest in the tibial plateau. Our method is relatively straightforward to implement into standard µCT analysis pipelines, allowing the analysis of CC morphology. In future research, µCT imaging might be preferable to histology, especially when analyzing dynamic changes in cartilage mineralization. It could also provide further understanding of 3D morphological changes that may occur in mineralized cartilage, such as thickening of the subchondral plate in osteoarthritis and other joint diseases.

Highlights

  • Calcified cartilage (CC) is a mineralized tissue delineated from the non-­ calcified articular cartilage by the tidemark, and from the subchondral bone by the cement line (Madry et al, 2010)

  • We developed a μCT-­based framework for 3D analysis of CC morphology

  • Our results demonstrate that CC.Th can be quantified from histology and from μCT, which is feasible and efficient due to an automatic segmentation approach

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Calcified cartilage (CC) is a mineralized tissue delineated from the non-­ calcified articular cartilage by the tidemark, and from the subchondral bone by the cement line (Madry et al, 2010). The thickness of articular cartilage (Cohen et al, 1999; Kiviranta, Tammi, et al, 1987) and subchondral bone (Milz & Putz, 1994) vary greatly in different areas of the knee joint with a high thickness in heavily loaded areas. CC imaging has been performed on images obtained from histological sections (Müller-­Gerbl et al, 1987) as well as backscattered scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in equine (Doube et al, 2007) and human joints (Ferguson et al, 2003; Gupta et al, 2005) Both histology and SEM require extensive and time-­consuming sample processing protocols and allow for two-­ dimensional (2D) imaging only. We demonstrate the capability of our automatic framework by assessing differences in CC.Th between the different anatomical locations

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
| RESULTS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call