Abstract

Simple SummaryGastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) account for roughly 60% of all neuroendocrine tumors, and low/intermediate grade human GEP-NETs have relatively slow growth rates that many laboratory culture methods fail to capture. Patient-derived cancer organoids (PDCOs) are an attractive model to address this need for relevant 3D cultures of GEP-NETs for laboratory drug testing. However, traditional measurements of drug response are not effective in GEP-NET PDCOs due to the small volume of tissue and slow growth rates that are characteristic of the disease. Here, we test a label-free, non-destructive optical metabolic imaging (OMI) method to measure drug response in live GEP-NET PDCOs. OMI measured a response to the novel treatment combination of ABT-263 and everolimus in five out of seven PDCO lines, at 72 h post-treatment. Overall, this work shows that OMI provides single-cell metabolic measurements of drug response in PDCOs to guide drug development for GEP-NET patients.Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) account for roughly 60% of all neuroendocrine tumors. Low/intermediate grade human GEP-NETs have relatively low proliferation rates that animal models and cell lines fail to recapitulate. Short-term patient-derived cancer organoids (PDCOs) are a 3D model system that holds great promise for recapitulating well-differentiated human GEP-NETs. However, traditional measurements of drug response (i.e., growth, proliferation) are not effective in GEP-NET PDCOs due to the small volume of tissue and low proliferation rates that are characteristic of the disease. Here, we test a label-free, non-destructive optical metabolic imaging (OMI) method to measure drug response in live GEP-NET PDCOs. OMI captures the fluorescence lifetime and intensity of endogenous metabolic cofactors NAD(P)H and FAD. OMI has previously provided accurate predictions of drug response on a single cell level in other cancer types, but this is the first study to apply OMI to GEP-NETs. OMI tested the response to novel drug combination on GEP-NET PDCOs, specifically ABT263 (navitoclax), a Bcl-2 family inhibitor, and everolimus, a standard GEP-NET treatment that inhibits mTOR. Treatment response to ABT263, everolimus, and the combination were tested in GEP-NET PDCO lines derived from seven patients, using two-photon OMI. OMI measured a response to the combination treatment in 5 PDCO lines, at 72 h post-treatment. In one of the non-responsive PDCO lines, heterogeneous response was identified with two distinct subpopulations of cell metabolism. Overall, this work shows that OMI provides single-cell metabolic measurements of drug response in PDCOs to guide drug development for GEP-NET patients.

Highlights

  • Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEP-NET) incidence and prevalence have increased 6-fold over the last 30 years [1]

  • The mammalian target of rapamycin pathway is upregulated in some GEP-NETs and can be targeted with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus

  • optical metabolic imaging (OMI) identifies treatment response where other methods such as patient-derived cancer organoids (PDCOs) diameter and proliferative rate fail due to the low proliferation rate of this disease. These novel methods of GEP-NET drug screening could streamline drug development for GEP-NET patients who are in great need of new therapies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEP-NET) incidence and prevalence have increased 6-fold over the last 30 years [1]. This elevated incidence is likely due to increased use of CT scan screening for other reasons, which enables incidental detection of GEP-NETs. Unresectable well-differentiated GEP-NETs are generally considered incurable, and options for systemic treatment are limited, after progression on somatostatin analogues and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Large phase 3 trials have proven the efficacy of everolimus monotherapy in treating pancreatic and non-pancreatic GEP-NETs, most patients will have progressive disease after less than 1 year of treatment [3,4]. Given the moderate effect of everolimus in these phase 3 trials, one strategy is to combine everolimus with other therapies in a rational manner

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call