Abstract

Cities throughout the world have used urban design to achieve certain goals and purposes, political, social, functional, physical or aesthetic. In developing countries, however, it has been common to use urban regeneration plans in the older sections of large cities to eliminate urban blight and decay, to eventually achieve modernisation and, in some cases, to also overcome social problems. Traditional, unitary, autocratic, elitist approaches to design and decision-making are common, and, as numerous experiences show, result in complete failure. This study intends, through a post-construction/post-occupancy evaluation of the Navab Regeneration Project in central Tehran, to explore the relationship between the process of urban design and its product, and to see how the problems involved in urban design might be connected to the decision-making processes applied. Our premise here is that a rational, open, participatory urban design process, as a prerequisite for a communicative, collaborative, democratic ci...

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.