Abstract
This comment responds to the several criticisms of the paper on the role of secondary electrons in liquid metal ion sources raised by Mair. In particular, it is pointed out that the experimental evidence does not contradict the conclusions of that paper. In addition to the secondary electron experimental data quoted by Mair some more recent results are reviewed.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.