Abstract
Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews of “Information Technology Ambidexterity, Digital Dynamic Capability, and Knowledge Processes as Enablers of Patient Agility: Empirical Study”
Highlights
Introduction aUse physicians in lieu of doctors b
Inclusion and exclusion criteria were combined with sample size, as we described how we got the final sample and why we included respondents
The paper should appeal to a broad audience. It is a good example of the underrepresented information and communications technology–centered literature in health care
Summary
Move the highlighted (in the reviewed manuscript) content under Data Collection Procedures to a new subsection under subsection heading Study Population (see comments in the reviewed manuscript) c. The highlighted content should be under a new subsection heading Study Design d. Before starting the survey, the respondents had to sign a consent form This approach is in line with the General Data Protection Regulation. Respondents were given the option to leave their email addresses to receive a research report. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were combined with sample size, as we described how we got the final sample and why we included respondents (and why not)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
