Abstract
We would like to thank both reviewers for their insightful commentaries. Common criticisms of studies comparing open and robotic radical prostatectomy are typically that (i) randomized, prospective studies are needed and (ii) given the natural history of prostate cancer, long-term follow-up is required to assess patient outcome. While we openly accept that our study does not fully address these two issues, we appreciate the recognition of its merit with this publication.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
