Abstract
Dr. Anger raises a number of excellent points in her Editorial Commentary. As authors, the 1 that most resonated with us was the need for excellent mentorship for all trainees in urology. Training in urology, as in many surgical subspecialties, once existed largely as an apprenticeship; within the “see one, do one, teach one” paradigm, there is no implied space for novel ideas, creative thought, or independent interests. While the apprenticeship model may function well for task-based learning, it does not foster or disseminate the creative ideas needed to promote advancements in medical and surgical care for increasingly diverse patient populations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
