Abstract
This study examines productivity in Business and Management Education (BME) scholarship, identifying the “top 99” authors in the most recent ten-year period (January 2008– December 2017). In addition to presenting the most up-to-date panorama of the top authors and disciplinary areas in the BME field, this study offers insights on how the field has evolved in comparison with the 2005-2014 productivity study by Arbaugh and colleagues (2017). A noteworthy finding is that the rankings proved very dynamic, with approximately 40% of the top-ranked authors being new to the list. The BME field continues to offer opportunities for establishing a profile as a highly productive author, since barriers for entry into the list remain relatively low: five articles continues to be the threshold for inclusion. Accounting expanded its dominance over other disciplinary areas, with the number of accounting education scholars in the list increasing from 28 to 36. Finally, in spite of numerous calls for wider geographic representation in BME scholarship, the number of highly productive authors affiliated with institutions outside the United States remains relatively low.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
