Abstract
In the first part of the paper the development of language tests towards authenticity is surveyed. The advantages and shortcomings of indirect vs direct (authentic) types are analysed. Whereas indirect tests were more efficient and lent themselves to psychometric analyses, they did not tap real-life language. On the other hand, direct tests based on real interactions aim at capturing real language and its variations in use. In the second part of the paper two problems involved in authentic tests are addressed: a) The difficulty of applying appropriate psychometric measures, caused by the complexity of tapping the whole construct of authentic language, and b) the large number of 'test' variables which interfere with the authenticity of the language produced and reduce it to authentic 'test language'.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
