Auswirkungen der komplexen Modellintervention CoCare auf die medizinische Versorgung in deutschen Pflegeheimen: eine Übersicht über die Ergebnis- und Prozessevaluation

Abstract

IntroductionMore and more people are being cared for in nursing homes these days. Multimorbidity results in frequent but sometimes unnecessary patient transports and hospitalisations. The CoCare intervention was developed as a nursing home-based intervention to improve coordination of medical care and GP and specialist care in long-term care homes. The project aimed to reduce avoidable hospital admissions and ambulance transportation, minimise costs through the resulting better collaboration and improving the quality of life of nursing home residents. This article presents the results of the process and outcome evaluation of the intervention in an integrated way and assesses them against the background of the project objectives. MethodsIntervention and data collection started in January 2018 and ended in September 2020. A mixed-methods design was chosen for the evaluation. The (cost) effectiveness of the intervention was tested by a controlled observational study, comparing intervention (IG) and control group (CG). As part of the evaluation of the results, claims data from health insurance funds and a questionnaire-based survey among nursing staff, physicians and nursing home residents were analysed. As part of the process evaluation, subjectively perceived changes in care and implementation difficulties were recorded with the help of focus groups and telephone interviews conducted quarterly. ResultsFrom the point of view of the health economic evaluation, with a decrease in total costs of € 468.56 (p<.001) per nursing home resident and quarter, an advantageous cost-benefit ratio can be assumed. Thus, the significant increase in outpatient care for nursing home residents goes along with a reduction of ambulance transportation by 0.19 (p=.049) and hospitalization rates by 0.08 (p=.001). In the nursing staff sample, a significant positive difference between IG (T1) and CG was observed with regard to communication and cooperation. In addition, pre-post comparison showed a significant improvement in the nursing staff's assessment of interprofessional cooperation in IG at T1 compared to T0. Both nursing staff and physicians perceived positive changes in care and positively assessed the benefit of the intervention. While practitioners experienced an intensification and improvement of communication and cooperation through the implementation of the CoCare measures, these changes were not perceived by residents. DiscussionThe CoCare intervention lowered the barriers for nursing homes to contact general practitioners, specifically in unclear situations and can thus be seen as an effective tool to reduce potentially avoidable hospital admissions and costs. It is conceivable that results can be transferred to other regions in Germany and to similar care scenarios. It should be examined to what extent approaches of this new form of care can be transferred to standard care and whether adjustments to facilitate the implementation of coordinated care approaches across occupational groups in inpatient care facilities can be proposed within the framework of legislative procedures.