Abstract

Australia’s innovative national anti-bullying legislation came into effect on 1 January 2014, against a backdrop of fear and resistance on the part of some conservative politicians and other stakeholder opponents. This paper contributes to an understanding of the efficacy and value of this fledgling jurisdiction or its lack thereof. In it, we describe the beginnings of the anti-bullying regime, outline the new legislative provisions, explore whether the inaction of the first six months has continued, examine the statistics arising from the jurisdiction’s first 15 months of operation, and review the case law development over its first 18 months. We ask whether the anti-bullying jurisdiction is proving to be a paper tiger in an empty suit or iron fist in a velvet glove.

Highlights

  • Workplace bullying is a significant problem in Australian workplaces

  • Note was made of decisions in which the applicant was no longer working in the workplace in which the alleged bullying had occurred, the manner of the applicant’s separation, the types of procedural and other deficiencies which led to applications being dismissed, and of the efforts made by the Fair Work Commission (FWC) to alert applicants to the procedural and other deficiencies in their applications

  • These included that she was subject to unreasonable behavior, that the behavior was repeated, that the unreasonable behavior occurred while she was at work, that the behavior was not reasonable management action carried out in a reasonable manner, that the behavior created a risk to health and safety, and that if anti-bullying orders were not made, there is a risk that she will continue to be bullied at work ([24], para. 17)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Workplace bullying is a significant problem in Australian workplaces. The Productivity Commission estimates the annual cost of workplace bullying to Australia’s economy at between $6–$36 billion dollars [1]. The new regime commenced on 1 January 2014, in the face of significant opposition from some employers, industry, and conservative (Coalition) politicians It gave the majority of individual Australian workers who were bullied at work a right to seek recourse via Australia’s prime national workplace relations regulator, the Fair Work Commission (FWC). We review the journey to the introduction of Australia’s new anti-bullying jurisdiction, outline the new legislative provisions, examine the statistics arising from the jurisdiction’s first 15 months of operation, and examine the case law development for the first 18 months with a view to understanding its value or lack thereof. Is it proving to be a paper tiger in an empty suit or an iron fist in a velvet glove?

Antecedents to the Reform
Legislating a National Anti-Bullying Regime
The Anti-Bullying Legislative Provisions
The Approach of the Fair Work Commission
The Initial Impact of the New Regime
Methodology
The Question of Procedural Failings
The Question of Stalling Tactics
Question of Frivolous or Vexatious Applicants?
Question of Bullying Conduct Prior to 1 January 2014
Question of a Constitutional or Trading Corporation?
Question of What Behaviours will Be Considered as “Bullying” or “Unreasonable”?
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.