Abstract
This note concerns recent changes to Australian international arbitration law that replace the existing common law ‘reasonable apprehension’ test for arbitrator bias with the ‘real danger’ test laid down by the House of Lords in R v Gough [1993] AC 646. Australia is the first country to adopt this test as a provision of its written arbitration law. This note provides some examples of the application of the ‘real danger’ test, and discusses how Australian courts may interpret and apply this ‘Model Law Plus’ provision in the coming years.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.