Abstract
While conducting a systematic study of Austinixa Heard and Manning, 1997, we encountered difficulties in distinguishing A. hardyi Heard and Manning, 1997 from A. aidae Righi, 1967, based on characters discussed in the current literature. We re‐examined morphological characters previously reported as diagnostic, and assessed their variation within and between these putative species. We expanded the analysis to include three independent types of data: discrete morphological characters, morphometric characters, and mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Partial sequences of the mitochondrial 16s rDNA and cytochrome oxidase I (COI) genes were almost identical between A. aidae and A. hardyi, raising questions about the validity of A. hardyi as a distinct species. Analysis of morphometric characters using multivariate (principal components analysis) and univariate allometric adjustment methods, support the mitochondrial DNA data in suggesting A. aidae and A. hardyi are a single species. Finally, we provide a brief review of the morphometric and molecular methods used in this study and comment on the usefulness of these methods in crustacean taxonomy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
