Abstract

This article examines the impact of austerity policies on gender inequality in Mexico and Brazil. More specifically, it seeks to discuss the need to reconcile public expenditure with a development strategy that actually includes a gender perspective. The feminization of poverty is of particular interest, as it is the basis upon which we try to outline the socioeconomic conditions in which Mexican and Brazilian women live with regards to progress, setbacks, and challenges. Thus, a brief explanation of the term austerity is provided with the purpose of reflecting on the limitations and opportunities that public expenditure might have in terms of gender inequality. Then, basic economic statistics concerning the dynamics of economic growth and public expenditure are included and certain key variables revolving around gender gaps in both countries are examined. Finally, we offer a diagnosis of the consequences of poverty on the female population in order to identify the leeway that public expenditure focused on gender should have for the most vulnerable population sector. The purpose is to promote development policies based on greater equality. In summary, as a result of the study, we observe that public expenditure intended at fighting against poverty (female-male) had considerable success in the case of Brazil, but not in the case of Mexico. However, in both countries, the recent deepening of austerity policies could limit the efforts of public expenditure on the feminization of poverty in particular, and on gender inequalities in general.

Highlights

  • Over the last few decades, given the financial deregulation characterizing the postBretton Woods era, we have witnessed countless economic and/or financial crises

  • The feminization of poverty is of particular interest, as it is the basis on which we seek to outline the socioeconomic conditions in which Mexican and Brazilian women live with regards to progress, setbacks, and challenges

  • This article explores the status of Mexican and Brazilian women by focusing on: (a) the importance of public expenditure in the construction of more successful development strategies, where the feminization of poverty and gender equality are actual priorities; (b) the measures taken by both countries to fight against gender inequality, mainly in terms of female poverty

Read more

Summary

Monika Meireles

The authors would like to acknowledge the support they received from Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación de la Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (DGAPA-UNAM) through projects PAPIIT IN302817 and PAPIIT IA301018. As a result of the study, we observe that public expenditure intended at fighting against poverty (female-male) had considerable success in the case of Brazil, but not in the case of Mexico In both countries, the recent deepening of austerity policies could limit the efforts of public expenditure on the feminization of poverty in particular, and on gender inequalities in general. This article explores the status of Mexican and Brazilian women by focusing on: (a) the importance of public expenditure in the construction of more successful development strategies, where the feminization of poverty and gender equality are actual priorities; (b) the measures taken (or not taken) by both countries to fight against gender inequality, mainly in terms of female poverty. It is not surprising that women are still thought of as “housewives and caregivers” rather than as part of the labor force and as the main source of family income

Labor Structure and Gender Gaps
Peru Uruguay
Feminization of Poverty in Mexico and Brazil
Findings
Bolsa de Famila
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call