Abstract
The study involves a series of surveys on Italian sources of Ausias March which communicate systematically with the most representative authors of that tradition (Cavalcanti, Dante, Petrarch and Boccaccio), showing both a broad and accurate knowledge as well as an innovative interpretation. In the great debate on Aristotle’s De anima, which determines the controversy between Cavalcanti and Dante on the nature of love, March shows closer Averroism of the first or the second Thomism.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
