Abstract

Purpose The US Government is challenged to maintain pace as the world’s de facto provider of space object cataloging data. Augmenting capabilities with nontraditional sensors present an expeditious and low-cost improvement. However, the large tradespace and unexplored system of systems performance requirements pose a challenge to successful capitalization. This paper aims to better define and assess the utility of augmentation via a multi-disiplinary study. Design/methodology/approach Hypothetical telescope architectures are modeled and simulated on two separate days, then evaluated against performance measures and constraints using multi-objective optimization in a heuristic algorithm. Decision analysis and Pareto optimality identifies a set of high-performing architectures while preserving decision-maker design flexibility. Findings Capacity, coverage and maximum time unobserved are recommended as key performance measures. A total of 187 out of 1017 architectures were identified as top performers. A total of 29% of the sensors considered are found in over 80% of the top architectures. Additional considerations further reduce the tradespace to 19 best choices which collect an average of 49–51 observations per space object with a 595–630 min average maximum time unobserved, providing redundant coverage of the Geosynchronous Orbit belt. This represents a three-fold increase in capacity and coverage and a 2 h (16%) decrease in the maximum time unobserved compared to the baseline government-only architecture as-modeled. Originality/value This study validates the utility of an augmented network concept using a physics-based model and modern analytical techniques. It objectively responds to policy mandating cataloging improvements without relying solely on expert-derived point solutions.

Highlights

  • Through a worldwide network of ground-based telescopes and radars as well as spacebased optical platforms, the US Government (USG) collects and processes data on over 23,000 satellites, rocket bodies and pieces of debris with a diameter of 10 cm or greater in orbit (Lal et al, 2018)

  • The general knowledge gleaned from collection of objects is referred to as Space Domain Awareness (SDA), which consists of both cataloging and characterization of Resident Space Objects (RSOs)

  • The Systems Program Office (SPO) purchase decision discussed in the Introduction section is addressed using Crawley et al.’s approach, which requires modeling and simulating architectural permutations, assessing them based on performance measures and using Pareto optimality to evaluate alternatives

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Through a worldwide network of ground-based telescopes and radars as well as spacebased optical platforms, the US Government (USG) collects and processes data on over 23,000 satellites, rocket bodies and pieces of debris with a diameter of 10 cm or greater in orbit (Lal et al, 2018). These Resident Space Objects (RSOs) are present in both the Near Earth and Deep Space orbital regimes. Rhodes and Ross outline an additional use of Pareto optimization in architecting via Epoch-Era Analysis, in which a system is assessed during multiple periods of fixed needs and contexts throughout its lifespan such that highperforming architectural choices common to all periods are posited as those with greater value (Rhodes and Ross, 2010)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call