Augmented otorhinologic evaluation in telemedical visits

Abstract

PurposeTo determine if an endoscopic otologic and rhinologic examination performed by a patient and interpreted remotely by an otolaryngologist is non-inferior to in-person examination, and to assess the feasibility of this system for telemedical visits. Materials and methodsTwenty healthy subjects performed a self-examination of their ears and nose using a commercially available endoscope under remote guidance by an otolaryngology provider over Zoom. This same provider and another otolaryngologist also performed separate, in-person examinations of each subject and rated their findings. Finally, both providers blindly reviewed a video recording of each virtual exam four weeks later and rated their findings. Subjects were surveyed about their experience. Interrater reliability was calculated using Cohen's kappa coefficients and the ability to detect different anatomic structures and features by in-person vs. virtual examination was compared using Wilcoxon tests and Chi-squared proportion tests. ResultsThe subjects' average age was 30 (SD 11.5) years. Interrater reliability was excellent; kappa coefficients were 0.72 and 0.81 (p < 0.001) for virtual and in-person exams, respectively. Of the 3 anatomic structures within the ear exam, none showed a difference in detectability between virtual and in-person exams. Of the 12 structures in the nasal exam, 3 were better visualized in-person and 9 showed no difference. Subject satisfaction was excellent; the average likelihood of recommending this virtual technology to peers (1–10) was 8.65 (SD 1.4). ConclusionsPatient self-examination of the ears and nose using a portable endoscope may be an effective strategy for obtaining valuable data during telemedical otolaryngology visits.