Abstract
In this paper we compare (augmented) GMRES-type methods and (augmented) CGNE methods. The numerical results show that the CGNE method is more robust and suitable for ill-posed problems with a much higher degree of ill-posedness. GMRES-type methods only yield useful results for very moderately ill-posed problems.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: ETNA - Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis
Paper Title
Journal
Date
