Abstract

Auditory frequency discrimination has been used as an index of sensory processing in developmental language disorders such as dyslexia, where group differences have often been interpreted as evidence for a basic deficit in auditory processing that underpins and constrains individual variability in the development of phonological skills. Here, we conducted a meta‐analysis to evaluate the cumulative evidence for group differences in frequency discrimination and to explore the impact of some potential moderator variables that could contribute to variability in effect‐size estimations across studies. Our analyses revealed mean effect sizes for group differences on frequency discrimination tasks on the order of three‐quarters of a standard deviation, but in the presence of substantial inter‐study variability in their magnitude. Moderator variable analyses indicated that factors related both to participant variability on behavioural and cognitive variables associated with the dyslexia phenotype, and to variability in the task design, contributed to differences in the magnitude of effect size across studies. The apparently complex pattern of results was compounded by the lack of concurrent, standardised metrics of cognitive and reading component skills across the constituent studies. Differences on sensory processing tasks are often reported in studies of developmental disorders, but these need to be more carefully interpreted in the context of non‐sensory factors, which may explain significant inter‐ and intra‐group variance in the dependent measure of interest.

Highlights

  • Developmental dyslexia manifests as an impairment of the normal developmental trajectory of reading-skill acquisition, for which difficulties in phonological skills are a predominant, proximal cause (Stanovich, 1988)

  • One aim of the analyses reported here, is to determine whether the literature on frequency discrimination in dyslexia can provide any evidence for such third variable effects, both through meta-regressions with the limited measures of cognitive skill that are available in this literature, and through an analysis of effect-sizes across different psychophysical task-designs

  • We aimed to identify the population of studies which obtained psychophysical measurements of frequency discrimination thresholds in participants with diagnoses of developmental dyslexia, compared to a control group

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Developmental dyslexia manifests as an impairment of the normal developmental trajectory of reading-skill acquisition, for which difficulties in phonological skills are a predominant, proximal cause (Stanovich, 1988). Robust auditory processing is one of a number of theoretical pre-requisites for the development of competent phonological skills. Atypical auditory processing has been reported in dyslexia for a wide range of acoustic stimuli (see Farmer & Klein, 1993; Habib, 2000; Hämäläinen, Salminen, & Leppänen, 2013, for review), but the nature and significance of these deficits to aetiological models of reading impairments remain under-defined. Does the presence of deficits reflect a basic-sensory level factor relevant to the causal aetiology of dyslexia, evidence for a more generalised difference in brain function, or do they manifest from methodological artefacts of the sampling or measurement techniques employed in a given study?

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call