Abstract

Auditory distraction occurs when unwanted sounds interfere with the perception or processing of target information. Cross-modal paradigms have identified target-distractor similarities, capacity limitations, and type of task load as factors that influence distractibility. Given the scarceness of data specific to the auditory domain, this study investigated contributions from these factors across four listening tasks varying in perceptual (PL) and cognitive load (CL). Thirty adults (M = 23.65 years) participated in all conditions and were divided into high- or low-working memory capacity (WMC) groups following a listening-span task. Targets were spoken-digits (1-through-9) and distractors were either “Standards” (80% of trials) or one of three “Deviants” (noise-bursts, consonants, spoken-digits; 20% of trials). Experiment 1, high-PL, and Experiment 4, high-CL, were the only two conditions yielding effects of WMC and distractors. Under high-PL, high-WMC group reaction times (RTs) were both longer overall (p = 0.026) and in the presence of spoken-digit distractors (p = 0.014). In contrast, under high-CL, low-WMC group RTs were longer overall (p < 0.01) and spoken-digit distractors affected both groups (p < 0.01). Experiments 2 and 3 shared low-PL and CL, resulting in no effects. Patterns suggest that load type for a given listening task drives how capacity limitations and target-distractor similarities impact auditory distractibility.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.