Abstract

Language flexibly supports the human ability to communicate using different sensory modalities, such as writing and reading in the visual modality and speaking and listening in the auditory domain. Although it has been argued that nonhuman primate communication abilities are inherently multisensory, direct behavioural comparisons between human and nonhuman primates are scant. Artificial grammar learning (AGL) tasks and statistical learning experiments can be used to emulate ordering relationships between words in a sentence. However, previous comparative work using such paradigms has primarily investigated sequence learning within a single sensory modality. We used an AGL paradigm to evaluate how humans and macaque monkeys learn and respond to identically structured sequences of either auditory or visual stimuli. In the auditory and visual experiments, we found that both species were sensitive to the ordering relationships between elements in the sequences. Moreover, the humans and monkeys produced largely similar response patterns to the visual and auditory sequences, indicating that the sequences are processed in comparable ways across the sensory modalities. These results provide evidence that human sequence processing abilities stem from an evolutionarily conserved capacity that appears to operate comparably across the sensory modalities in both human and nonhuman primates. The findings set the stage for future neurobiological studies to investigate the multisensory nature of these sequencing operations in nonhuman primates and how they compare to related processes in humans.

Highlights

  • Language transcends the sensory modalities that provide humans with a medium for communication

  • Macaque monkeys were tested with sequences of auditory or visual stimuli

  • The macaques were exposed to a subset of the sequences generated by the artificial grammar (AG)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Language transcends the sensory modalities that provide humans with a medium for communication. Many of the cognitive processes that support language are thought to be sensory input invariant. Evidence for evolutionary precursors to human language can be assessed by studying the extent to which nonhuman animal abilities are multimodal (Hauser et al, 2002; Fitch, 2010). There is already evidence to support the notion that the communicative abilities of nonhuman animals are inherently multisensory (Jordan et al, 2005; Budinger et al, 2006; Ghazanfar and Schroeder, 2006; Chandrasekaran et al, 2009; Leavens et al, 2010; Cohen et al, 2011; Romanski, 2012; Soto-Faraco et al, 2012; Ghazanfar and Takahashi, 2014). How multisensory the structured sequence processing abilities of nonhuman animals are remains unknown

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call