Auditory and inspiratory gasp-evoked sympathetic skin response: age effects

Abstract

The sympathetic skin response (SSR) has been employed to assess peripheral neuropathy as an index of sympathetic sudomotor activity. A variety of stimuli can be used to elicit the SSR, but their relative ease of use and reliability have not been studied. In addition, the extent to which age affects the SSR remains unresolved. We compared two different stimuli, a sudden loud noise and an inspiratory gasp, whilst recording SSRs from the hand and foot. We also investigated the effects of age on SSR amplitude and latency in 58 healthy volunteers (ages 13–79). SSRs evoked by the auditory stimulus were recorded in all subjects, while gasp-induced SSRs were not elicited in two subjects. We found that SSRs evoked by the auditory stimulus had less inter- and intra-subject latency and waveform variability than the gasp-induced response. The increased latency variability associated with the inspiratory gasp technique was probably due to triggering errors. Our results confirmed that the amplitude of the SSR is extremely variable and appears to be affected by many factors. Auditory-evoked SSR latencies revealed a significant non-linear increase with age, while SSRs evoked by an inspiratory gasp did not demonstrate age dependence. We conclude that an auditory stimulus is superior to an inspiratory gasp in evoking SSRs, both in terms of consistent appearance and reduced latency variability. As the SSR latency increases significantly with age, this effect should be carefully considered when interpreting the response.