Abstract

To characterize the auditory and imaging markers of atypical enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA). 15 EVA cases (26 ears) confirmed via high-resolution MRI (HRMRI) that did not meet the Valvassori criterion on high-resolution CT (HRCT) were classified as atypical EVA. Another 21 EVA cases (40 ears) meeting the Valvassori criterion were randomly chosen as typical EVA. The hearing loss (HL), HRCT, and HRMRI findings were compared between the two groups. The difference of HL severity between atypical and typical EVA was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.12, P > 0.05. The vestibular aqueducts (VA) of atypical EVA cases manifested as borderline dilation (n = 17), focal dilation (n = 3), and normal appearance (n = 6) on the HRCT. The midpoint width of atypical and typical EVA cases was 1.06 ± 0.18mm and 2.10 ± 0.55mm, respectively, exhibiting a significant difference (t = - 9.20, P < 0.05). In the HRMRI, the degree of dilation and shape of the intraosseous partition of endolymphatic duct and sac (ES) was similar to that of VA on HRCT, while their extraosseous ES was depicted variable slighter dilation compared to that of typical one, the difference between them was statistically significant (t = - 4.10, P < 0.05). The HL severity of atypical EVA ears was similar to that of typical ones. Nevertheless, borderline, focal dilation and normal-like appearance of VAs on HRCT and variablely slighter dilation of the extraosseous ES on HRMRI are its characteristic imaging findings.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.