Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant global cause for morbidity and mortality of surgical patients. Clinical guidelines written by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) in Great Britain is available to manage this problem. The Sri Lanka Health Service currently has no such guidelines. We conducted a retrospective audit of current practice of VTE prophylaxis in general surgical patients having operations at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL). Ethical approval was obtained. Clinical records were perused to audit risk assessment and management by clinical teams involved. A data form addressing NICE guidelines was used and statistically analysed. Of 244 cases listed in the theatre register 154 case notes were located. We identified that clinical staff were deficient in obtaining information required to classify patient risk of VTE. Only 13% of cases had a Body Mass Index calculated. Sub optimal records were evident in the surgical, anaesthetic and nursing notes. Majority of cases had one or more risk factors for VTE. Most patients underwent elective surgery under general anaesthesia. 71.4% of patients had an indication for mechanical, pharmacological or both methods for VTE prophylaxis. None of the patients requiring only mechanical or only pharmacological prophylaxis received any. Only 5.9% of patients were correctly administered both forms of prophylaxis when required. Administration of mechanical prophylaxis was not documented in a single case. We suggest changes at an institutional/ individual level. These should aim to improve proper note binding, clinical record keeping, availability of guidelines/ protocols and a multi-disciplinary approach to risk assessment. Hospitals should ensure a minimum standard availability of mechanical prophylaxis. Anaesthetists should cover VTE risk during pre-operative assessment. Mechanical prophylaxis commenced in theatre should be documented in the anaesthetic chart. Post-operative visit should include a risk assessment for ongoing risk of VTE. Measures should be taken to re-audit clinical practice according to set guidelines in future. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/slja.v20i1.4272 Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology 20(1): 23-27 (2012)
Highlights
Of 244 cases listed in the theatre register 154 case notes were located
A.H Sheriffdeen highlighted the importance for Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in Sri Lanka in 1984 and further re-iterated it in 20013,4. 10 years later the National Health Service in Sri Lanka is still short of guidelines on VTE prophylaxis
This audit is a comparison of clinical risk assessment and provision for VTE prophylaxis at NHSL against National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline standards
Summary
Of 244 cases listed in the theatre register 154 case notes were located. We identified that clinical staff were deficient in obtaining information required to classify patient risk of VTE. We suggest changes at an institutional/ individual level These should aim to improve proper note binding, clinical record keeping, availability of guidelines/ protocols and a multi-disciplinary approach to risk assessment. Surgery is associated with a substantial risk of VTE within the first post operative week in comparison to the background incidence of VTE in the general population[1]. 10 years later the National Health Service in Sri Lanka is still short of (freely accessible) guidelines on VTE prophylaxis. This audit is a comparison of clinical risk assessment and provision for VTE prophylaxis at NHSL against NICE guideline standards
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
