Abstract
AimsTo assess the use of a piloted shorter version of the local Checklist for Antipsychotic Initiation and Review (CAIR) form by an Older Persons Community Mental Health Team (OPCMHT), and to assess whether the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline on use of antipsychotics for the management of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) is being adhered to.MethodRetrospective audit analysing notes of all patients currently open to the OPCMHT that are prescribed an antipsychotic medication for the management of BPSD. Patients with a diagnosis of any subtype of dementia and prescribed any antipsychotic were included. Data collected from paper notes using an audit proforma.ResultThe total number of patients was 11. The most common diagnosis was Alzheimer's disease (45%), followed by mixed type dementia (36%), vascular dementia (9%) and Lewy Body dementia (9%). The majority of the patients reside in their own home (64%) whilst the remaining 36% reside in a residential home for the elderly and mentally infirm. The CAIR form was present in 73% of the patient's notes, however only 37% had the new, piloted, shorter version of the CAIR form. Of the CAIR forms present, only 63% were fully completed. There was documented evidence that 100% of patients had an assessment of underlying causes of their challenging behaviour; that non-pharmacological interventions were tried first; and that target symptoms were identified. There was evidence of a discussion with the patient or carer about the risks and benefits of antipsychotic use for all patients, however the details of the discussion was often vague. All patients had a review of the antipsychotic medication within the last three months.ConclusionThere was evidence that pre-prescribing assessments are being undertaken for all patients. There needs to be clearer documentation of the discussions had with patients and carers about the risks and benefits of using antipsychotic medications for management of BPSD. A teaching session was held at the team meeting to highlight the risks and benefits. The team will ensure that they provide a health board approved leaflet to each patient and carer following their discussion. Only 73% of the patients had a CAIR form in their notes and the team favour the original version. The team will revert back to using the original version of the CAIR form as it has more space allocated to document ongoing reviews. We will re-audit in 6 months time.
Highlights
To ensure restrictive practices are only used in exceptional circumstances for short term risk management
Data were collected from RiO computer records, extracting details of patient demographics, reasons and context of seclusion, risk reduction steps prior, length of seclusion, monitoring, and modifications to care plans
Care plan modification rates improved from 63% to over 95%
Summary
To re-audit seclusion practices within a Tier 4 Adolescent PICU provision in London, originally audited in 2018. To ensure restrictive practices are only used in exceptional circumstances for short term risk management. To evaluate whether practice has improved following introduction of incidence reduction strategies and identify any further areas of development.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
