Abstract
Abstract Some key ideological beliefs that typically inform and underlie ‘audit-mindedness’ in counselling are critically examined. Specifically, and drawing upon the radical and neglected ideas of psycho-social analyst Wasdell, it is argued that the preoccupation with ‘quantity’ and measur-ability that typifies ‘objective’ counselling outcome studies reflects, at least in part, the disintegrative splitting process that pervades technocratic culture; and that this is in turn rooted in the pathological aspects of early developmental experience. Positivist conceptions of the scientific method are seen to be not only fundamentally ideological and pathology-driven, but a singularly inappropriate means of evaluating the efficacy of counselling and psychotherapy. The article then considers the possibility of transforming the ideological belief system that underlies the positivist conception of science which drives the demand for ‘objective’ outcome studies in counselling and psychotherapy. It concludes by consi...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
