Abstract

Learning to read involves efficient binding of visual to auditory information. Aberrant cross-modal binding skill has been observed in both children and adults with developmental dyslexia. Here, we examine the contribution of episodic memory to acquisition of novel cross-modal bindings in typical and dyslexic adult readers. Participants gradually learned arbitrary associations between unfamiliar Mandarin Chinese characters and English-like pseudowords over multiple exposures, simulating the early stages of letter-to-letter sound mapping. The novel cross-modal bindings were presented in consistent or varied locations (i.e., screen positions), and within consistent or varied contexts (i.e., co-occurring distractor items). Our goal was to examine the contribution, if any, of these episodic memory cues (i.e., the contextual and spatial properties of the stimuli) to binding acquisition, and investigate the extent to which readers with and without dyslexia would differ in their reliance on episodic memory during the learning process. Participants were tested on their ability to recognize and recall the bindings both during training and then in post-training tasks. We tracked participants’ eye movements remotely with their personal webcams to assess whether they would re-fixate relevant empty screen locations upon hearing an auditory cue—indicative of episodic memory retrieval—and the extent to which the so-called “looking-at-nothing behavior” would modulate recognition of the novel bindings. Readers with dyslexia both recognized and recalled significantly fewer bindings than typical readers, providing further evidence of their persistent difficulties with cross-modal binding. Looking-at-nothing behavior was generally associated with higher recognition error rates for both groups, a pattern that was particularly more evident in later blocks for bindings encoded in the inconsistent location condition. Our findings also show that whilst readers with and without dyslexia are capable of using stimulus consistencies in the input—both location and context—to assist in audiovisual learning, readers with dyslexia appear particularly reliant on consistent contextual information. Taken together, our results suggest that whilst readers with dyslexia fail to efficiently learn audiovisual binding as a function of stimulus frequency, they are able to use stimulus consistency—aided by episodic recall—to assist in the learning process.

Highlights

  • Binding visual forms to phonological forms is a fundamental skill in the initial stages of grapheme-phoneme learning, providing a foundation for the later development of integrated visual-phonological representations that are crucial for skilled reading

  • We examine how adults with dyslexia and typical readers may differ in their reliance on episodic memory cues as they acquire novel cross-modal bindings that vary in location-related and contextual consistency over the course of the learning process

  • We examine whether specific statistical properties of stimulus exposures differentially affect learning in adults with and without developmental dyslexia

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Binding visual forms to phonological forms is a fundamental skill in the initial stages of grapheme-phoneme learning, providing a foundation for the later development of integrated visual-phonological representations that are crucial for skilled reading. Readers with developmental dyslexia exhibit indications of less-integrated grapheme-phoneme representations (Blau et al, 2009, 2010; Blomert, 2011; Warmington and Hulme, 2012; Aravena et al, 2013, 2018; Žaricet al., 2015), a deficit owing in part to their comparatively poorer cross-modal binding skills (Aravena et al, 2013; Jones et al, 2013b, 2018; Žaricet al., 2015; Albano et al, 2016; Toffalini et al, 2018, 2019; Garcia et al, 2019). We examine how adults with dyslexia and typical readers may differ in their reliance on episodic memory cues as they acquire novel cross-modal bindings that vary in location-related and contextual consistency over the course of the learning process

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call