Abstract

To determine factors associated with steroid responsiveness and efficacy of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic (DMARD) use in patients with Cogan Syndrome (CS). A systematic search of Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Any study describing audiometric or vestibular data and pharmacologic treatment in patients with CS was included. Due to limited literature, only case reports/case series were included. Seventy case reports or case series studies comprising 79 individual cases of CS were included. A difference in vestibular symptoms with a higher prevalence in the steroid-resistant group than the steroid-responsive group was found (79.5% vs 57.9%, p = 0.04). Eighteen (60.0%) patients treated only with oral steroids had no audiological improvement, while twelve (n = 12; 85.7%) patients treated with biologic DMARD showed audiological improvement. The steroid-responsive group had an overall better response to DMARDs than the steroid-resistant group (62.1% vs 45.0%; 100.0% vs 77.8%). Our study synthesized the available literature to better characterize steroid resistance in patients with Cogan syndrome and treatment outcomes. Vestibular symptoms were noted to be more prevalent in patients who were eventually labeled as steroid resistant. There were higher rates of audiological improvement in patients given biologic DMARDs rather than conventional DMARDs or steroids only. Further studies are needed to characterize each individual vestibular symptom and investigate the utility and timing of biologic DMARDs in managing patients with Cogan syndrome.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.