Abstract

BackgroundFollow-up return rate in Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programmes is of specific importance as it ensures that benchmarks are met and that no child with suspected hearing loss is left unidentified.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the factors influencing audiological follow-up of high-risk infants in a risk-based newborn hearing screening programme.MethodA non-experimental, exploratory, qualitative research design was employed. Purposive sampling was used. The study was conducted at a secondary level hospital in the public health care sector in South Africa. Participants comprised 10 caregivers (age range 26–40 years) of infants who had been enrolled in a risk-based newborn hearing screening programme, and returned for follow-up appointments. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews. Responses were recorded by the researcher and a colleague to ensure rigour and trustworthiness of findings. Data were analysed using thematic analysis for open-ended questions and descriptive statistics for the closed-ended questions.ResultsThe most common positive contributors that facilitated participants’ attendance at follow-up appointments were: having friendly audiologists; a clear line of communication between caregiver and audiologist and a reminder of the appointment. The most significant perceived challenge that participants described in returning for the follow-up appointment was living in far proximity from the hospital.ConclusionFindings of the study revealed that influencing factors on follow-up return rate are demographic, socio-economic, and interpersonal in nature and further suggested the need for an all-inclusive appointment day. It may be of importance to not only look at what is being done to improve the follow-up return rate but also how it should be done in terms of professional-to-patient communication and interactions.

Highlights

  • The ability of a developing child to hear is of great importance

  • Detection of hearing loss can be addressed through Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS) programmes as recommended by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH, 2007) and the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA, 2007)

  • A study conducted in the United States of America (USA) revealed a follow-up return rate of 58% and 100% at two different hospitals (Todd, 2006), whilst studies conducted in Lagos, Nigeria and South Africa revealed return rates of 16% and 31.4%, respectively (Kanji, Khoza-Shangase, & Ballot, 2010; Olusanya, Wirz, & Luxon, 2008)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ability of a developing child to hear is of great importance. The age at identification of hearing loss and intervention is vital in ensuring early diagnosis and intervention, as this leads to positive developmental outcomes (Yoshinaga-Itano, 2003). Detection of hearing loss can be addressed through Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS) programmes as recommended by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH, 2007) and the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA, 2007). Because of the fact that Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) is not yet fully implemented within the South African context, risk-based newborn hearing screening (screening of newborns and infants with risk factors for hearing impairment) has been recommended as the interim solution where UNHS is not immediately feasible (HPCSA, 2007; Kanji & Khoza-Shangase, 2016). Developing countries experience a significantly lower follow-up return rate than developed countries. Follow-up return rate in Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programmes is of specific importance as it ensures that benchmarks are met and that no child with suspected hearing loss is left unidentified

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call