Abstract
The statements in Hans Faverey’s poems often seem to contradict each other: chrysanthemums are not chrysanthemums, and what exists turns out not to exist. That the disruption of logic also has ontological implications becomes plausible when one sees that the poet often refers to the pre-Socratic philosophers Parmenides, Zeno and Heraclitus. Using the concepts of metaphor, metonym, allegory, symbol and ritual, this article argues that many of Faverey’s poems can be interpreted as ontological allegories.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.