Atypical "Sclerosing" Osteoblastic Neoplasm: A Tumor of Intermediate Biological Potential Between Usual Osteoblastoma and Conventional Osteosarcoma.

Abstract

The existence of "aggressive" osteoblastoma (OB) or malignant transformation of OB is controversial. Over a few decades, we have encountered a group of "borderline" sclerosing osteoblastic lesions that are difficult to classify, tending toward local recurrence, especially following curettage. A search of the consultative and institutional files from 3 co-authors for atypical OB, malignant transformation of OB, well-differentiated osteosarcoma (OS), and OB-like OS diagnoses revealed 8 similar cases. There were 6 males and 2 females, ages 11 to 55 years (mean, 26 y). Three arose in metatarsals, 2 in the fibula, and 1 each in the humerus, tibia, and femur. Radiologically, most were expansile, lytic to sclerotic, with circumscribed and at least partially sclerotic borders. Pathologically, all displayed a predominant, sclerosing sheet-like neoplastic bone growth pattern, associated with minor components of conventional OB. No solid sheets of osteoblasts or permeation of surrounding bone were identified. Six cases were reviewed by >1 expert orthopedic pathologist, often with divergent opinions. Four were initially diagnosed as OB, 2 as low-grade OS, 1 as high-grade OS, and 1 as atypical sclerosing osteoblastic neoplasm. Clinical follow-up for 7 patients ranged from 12 to 138 months (mean, 71 mo). Four underwent curettage only; 2, curettage and en bloc resection with negative margins; 1, en bloc intralesional resection, and 1 amputation. 5 locally recurred, with 3 "reclassified" as OSs. One local recurrence was considered dedifferentiation. Whether these tumors represent low-grade OSs or aggressive forms of OB remains unclear. We recommend classifying these neoplasms as "atypical sclerosing osteoblastic neoplasm" and performing complete resection with negative margins.