Abstract
Differentiating and clarifying the driving factors behind streamflow changes are critical for highlighting hydrological responses to changing environments. However, due to the limited number of hydrological stations, the dominant factor controlling global observed streamflow change remains unclear and intensely debated. Here, we revisit this scientific issue by using the most comprehensive dataset to attribute the observed global streamflow changes during 1960–2014. The results suggest that other factors than precipitation (P) and potential evaporation (E0) are the most important contributors to global observed streamflow changes, which dominate streamflow change for 48.9–50.9% of the stations. In contrast, the dominant factor translated into P in 72.3–72.9% of stations when using reconstructed streamflow datasets, in agreement with most previous global assessments. These differences indicate that streamflow attributions using reconstructed streamflow might overestimate the effects of P while underestimating the roles of other factors, such as the vegetation and human impact. At the global scale, the other factors affected by many catchment characteristics and their impacts on streamflow change have remarkable regional differences. This study highlights the necessity to apply the observed data in streamflow attribution to avoid biased conclusions regarding the dominant factor of streamflow changes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.