Abstract

The attribution of profits to Permanent Establishments (PE) is one of the most discussed topics in international tax literature, the reason being that the attribution determines the amount of taxation in a PE state. Particular problems arise if such profits are derived before or after the existence of a PE. The article discusses the attribution of such profits under tax treaty law provided for by the OECD Model Tax Convention. In doing so, it is found that profits derived before or after the existence of a PE should be attributed to the PE because not only the wording but also the context and purpose of the OECD Model support this view. In further analysis, however, it is shown that slight changes in the attribution may be expected under the new “Authorized OECD Approach”.

Highlights

  • If an enterprise maintains a Permanent Establishment (PE) in another state, the allocation of taxing rights for the profits of the enterprise requires the attribution o f profits to the Permanent Establishments (PE) 1

  • Following the arguments outlined so far, PE profit allocation should not depend on the tim e when the incom e is derived

  • All incom e is allocated to a PE to the extent that it is caused by an activity carried on in this or through this PE at the tim e o f its existence[58]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

If an enterprise maintains a Permanent Establishment (PE) in another state, the allocation of taxing rights for the profits of the enterprise requires the attribution o f profits to the PE 1. Tax treaties govern the allocation o f taxing rights for business profits under Art. 7 o f the O EC D M odel by means o f the so-called PE concept[7] According to this principle, a state may only tax the profits of an enterprise of the other state if the enterprise carries on its business through a PE situated in its territory and, under such conditions, only the portion o f the profits that is attributable to the PE. According to the benefit principle, taxation may be justified in this case because even the enterprise benefits from the public goods o f that state[12] Notwithstanding the latter, treaty practice regularly ties the taxing right for business profits to a PE being a fix e d place o f business. The taxation based on the benefit principle becom es secondary to practicability aspects

No Further Guidance from the 2010 PE Report
C o m p rehensive Taxing R ight fo r a PE State
Coverage of Subsequent Income
Irrelevance of the Tim e of Income Derivation
Teleological Aspects Regarding Preceding or Subsequent Income of a PE
Interim Conclusion
Generation of Preceding and Subsequent Income by a PE
Irrelevance of Causation in Case of Sunk Start-up Expenses
Continued Validity of the Causation Principle
Impacts of the AOA on Preceding Income
Effects of the AOA on Subsequent Income
Procedurę of Allocating Preceding and Subsequent Income
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.