Abstract

While macrofossil remains of herbs and flowers have disintegrated beyond identification, pollen survives the digestive process and can be identified, sometimes to species level, and is hence an important tool in determining and reconstructing animal diets. This study compares macroscopic plant parts and pollen remains in faeces from grouse. While macroscopic remains reflect the quantity of bark, twigs, berries and leaves in the birds' food, the pollen also reflects other food, such as catkins, flower buds with developed pollen, flowers and pollen attached to leaves. Both techniques reflect that Betula and Salix are the most important food for grouse in early Spring. Pollen analysis shows that later in Spring, after snow-melt, the birds are attracted to different plants, firstly, it is taxa within the Ericales and their fruits from the previous year. The nutrient value of food in periods with more or less snow cover is based on the environmental conditions of the previous year. Later on, different herbs, including insect-pollinated plants rich in nectar/sugar, are recorded in the pollen but are not reflected in the macro study, and are therefore lost in most calculations and not discussed. Nutrient content calculations based on Spring and Summer flowers need to be compared with the environmental and climate conditions of the current year.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call