Abstract

Reducing the supply voltage is by far the most widely used low-power technique, as reducing dynamic power quadratically and leakage power linearly, while sacrificing on performances. A similar but less explored route is to reduce and/or limit currents (instead of reducing voltages), e.g., through transistor sizing. This paper details a comparison of a reverse-sized CMOS scheme (which reduces currents), with both a classical CMOS implementation and an ultra low power (ULP) sub-threshold CMOS scheme. Simulation results show that the reverse-sized CMOS inverter performs well over the whole range of supply voltages: (i) it dissipates significantly less than a classical CMOS inverter (20–60×), while it does degrade performances (5–20×) but less than power gaining, i.e., not proportionally; (ii) it is much faster (100–200×) than a ULP inverter, at moderately larger power consumptions (10–40×), but again less than proportional; and (iii) its power-delay-product (PDP) is constantly 5–8× lower than that of the other two inverters considered over the whole range of supply voltages. In particular, a reverse-sized CMOS inverter in 16nm at 300mV has a delay of 9.16ns while breaking the atto-Joule barrier (0.906aJ).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.