Abstract

Multi-dimensional structure of the Attitudes Towards Ambiguity Scale (ATAS: original Japanese version) and its relationship with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) were investigated. We administered the ATAS and the Japanese version of the AAQ to 1019 Japanese healthy volunteers (513 females and 506 males; age range 18–78 years). Trial of exploratory factor analysis extracted four distinct clusters (Enjoyment; α = .83, Anxiety; α = .75, Exclusion; α = .75, and Noninterference; α = .65) from the ATAS item pool, suggestive of diversity in cognitive/ emotional/ behavioral responses to ambiguity. Confirmative factor analysis showed similar goodness in fit indices between the new four-factor model in the present study and the original five-factor model in our previous study (Nishimura 2007). Considering interpretability by using large number of representative samples with general population in the present study, we adopted the four-factor model. The ATAS Anxiety subscale was negatively correlated with the AAQ willingness subscale (r = −.39, p < .001), while the ATAS Enjoyment subscale was positively correlated with the AAQ Action subscale (r = .40, p < .001). It is thus suggested that one who enjoys ambiguous situations can adopt two distinct attitudes: Excluding ambiguity from active resolution, or not interfering with ambiguity due to good tolerance of this experience, which can lead to positive and flexible commitments in life. In contrast, one who tends to be anxious about ambiguity may be characterized by exclusion-based attitudes due to intolerance of ambiguity, leading to lowered acceptance of their feelings and of the reality of circumstances. Cognitive/emotional attitudes towards ambiguity may affect acceptance of inner experience and active commitment to reality.

Highlights

  • Multi-dimensional structure of the Attitudes Towards Ambiguity Scale (ATAS: original Japanese version) and its relationship with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) were investigated

  • Tolerance of ambiguity has been investigated primarily with regard to negative responses to ambiguous stimuli such as threat, discomfort, and anxiety (Grenier et al 2005), positive cognitive and emotional responses such as curiosity and attraction towards ambiguous situations can occur, as suggested by Montuori (2005) and Zenasni and Lubart (2008), who found some aspects of attitudes towards ambiguity to be associated with creativity

  • ATAS score distributions did not deviate from normality, based on checking for ceiling and floor effects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Multi-dimensional structure of the Attitudes Towards Ambiguity Scale (ATAS: original Japanese version) and its relationship with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) were investigated. It is suggested that one who enjoys ambiguous situations can adopt two distinct attitudes: Excluding ambiguity from active resolution, or not interfering with ambiguity due to good tolerance of this experience, which can lead to positive and flexible commitments in life. Tolerance of ambiguity has been investigated primarily with regard to negative responses to ambiguous stimuli such as threat, discomfort, and anxiety (Grenier et al 2005), positive cognitive and emotional responses such as curiosity and attraction towards ambiguous situations can occur, as suggested by Montuori (2005) and Zenasni and Lubart (2008), who found some aspects of attitudes towards ambiguity to be associated with creativity. It is important to analyze diversity in personal cognitive/affective/behavioral patterns regarding ambiguous situations, rather than assessing individual tolerance to ambiguous stimuli

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call