Abstract

BackgroundChiropractic technique systems (‘prescriptive’ techniques) might be interpreted as helpful guidelines. However, ‘prescriptive’ techniques, such as Functional Neurology (FN), Sacro-Occipital Technique, and Applied Kinesiology are more concerned with the ‘technical’ diagnosis than the condition and its symptoms and, thus, seem to provide easy solutions.Design and objectivesIn a voluntary anonymous questionnaire survey carried out late 2017, we explored interest in ‘prescriptive’ techniques, particularly FN, among French chiropractic students in grades 3–6, and the possible link with chiropractic conservatism. We investigated their: i) attitudes to the use of ‘prescriptive’ techniques, ii) awareness of FN, and iii) attitudes to FN. Further, if their attitudes to some conservative chiropractic concepts influenced their clinical approach on iv) some ‘prescriptive’ chiropractic techniques and v) attitudes to FN.MethodData reported in tables illustrated the prevalence of the use of ‘prescriptive’ techniques, awareness of FN, and positive attitude to FN (i.e. interest in and acceptance of). Students were given a FN score based on five questions on their interest in and acceptance of FN (0 to 5), dichotomized into two groups: ‘not positive attitude’ (0 to 1) and ‘positive attitude’ (2 to 5). Chiropractic conservatism was graded from 1 to 4. Associations were tested between conservatism groups and i) interest in ‘prescriptive’ techniques and ii) FN attitudes groups.ResultsThe response rate was 67% (N = 359), of which 90% were positive toward ‘prescriptive’ techniques. Only 10% had never heard about FN and in the 6th year all had heard about it. Only a minority, unrelated to the year of study, approved of the two examples given of FN concepts. Nevertheless, a majority were positive towards FN, more so in the higher grades. Students with the most conservative beliefs were 17 times more likely to want to use ‘prescriptive’ techniques and 11 times more likely to have a higher FN score.ConclusionAlthough not taught in the curriculum, these students were attracted to ‘prescriptive’ techniques including FN, particularly in the higher grades. Curiously, despite this interest they do not generally agree with some key concepts within FN.

Highlights

  • Les recommandations de bonnes pratiques aident les thérapeutes à actualiser leurs connaissances et à exercer une pratique fondée sur les faits

  • A minority, unrelated to the year of study, approved of the two examples given of Functional Neurology (FN) concepts

  • Comparisons between responders and non-responders As shown in Table 3, there were somewhat more responders in Toulouse than in Paris (80% vs. 59%), the 3rd year students were more likely to participate than the 5th year students (81% vs. 55%), and the Acceptance of and interest in Functional Neurology

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Les recommandations de bonnes pratiques aident les thérapeutes à actualiser leurs connaissances et à exercer une pratique fondée sur les faits. Guidelines in medicine and chiropractic are usually developed by groups of clinicians with research experience, reviewed by experts and by other clinicians with relevant background [1] They are useful to guide the clinician towards an up-to-date and evidence-based approach to diagnosis and treatment. Some chiropractors apply such technique systems to all types of patients regardless symptoms, letting the ‘technical diagnosis’ guide the treatment. In other cases, they are considered a help to deal with an overruling specific diagnosis (e.g. of discal hernia, spinal stenosis). ‘prescriptive’ techniques, such as Functional Neurology (FN), Sacro-Occipital Technique, and Applied Kinesiology are more concerned with the ‘technical’ diagnosis than the condition and its symptoms and, seem to provide easy solutions

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call