Attitudes on access to services at assisted reproductive technology clinics: comparisons with clinic policy

Abstract

Objective: To determine the opinions of assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinic directors on access-to-services issues and to compare these opinions with policy at ART clinics. Design: Survey sent to ART clinic directors. Setting: Academic medical center, university-based ethics institute. Patient(s): None. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Assisted reproductive technology directors’ opinions about access to services are related to specific clinic policies. Access issues examined include patient attributes (marital status, age, sexual preference), patient behaviors (substance abuse, psychiatric history, child abuse), number of cycles, and types of procedures offered (surrogacy, cloning, ova cryopreservation, ART for HIV-positive individuals). Result(s): Provider opinion was more restrictive than clinic policy in 19 of 20 categories measured. The largest difference between opinion and policy was seen on the question of setting restrictions as to age of the male partner. About 20% of directors think that surrogacy for convenience should be allowed: about 10% of directors think cloning of human beings should be offered. Conclusion(s): The opinions of ART directors on access to services are more conservative than clinic policies. Contributing factors may include respect for patient autonomy; fear of litigation; policy that reflects a continuum of beliefs among providers; and economic pressure to offer a broad range of procedures.