Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aims to explore psychologists' attitudes towards the use of video conferencing technology (VCT) to deliver therapy.MethodParticipants (N = 12) were recruited via opportunistic sampling either via the Australian Psychological Society website or social media. Participants (three males and nine females) were located in Queensland. They were aged between 23 and 50-years of age (mean age = 32.91, SD = 9.36), held varying levels of experience in psychology (<1 year to 12-years) and types of endorsement (e.g. provisional, general, clinical and health). A semistructured interview schedule was applied in‐person (n = 7) or via telephone (n = 5). Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's (2006) five‐step method for assessing qualitative data in psychology.ResultsResults indicated that psychologists' attitudes towards VCT to deliver therapy paralleled the tri‐component definition of attitudes proposed by Breckler (1984) and Rajecki (1982 ). Subthemes reflecting these components included perceived limitations or benefits of VCT (i.e. a cognitive component), a sense of comfort when using VCT (i.e. an affective component), and a general tendency to resist or embrace VCT (i.e. a behavioural disposition).ConclusionsKey barriers and facilitators identified underscore the need for training to improve knowledge and awareness of VCT, including its evidence base. Specifically, the assistance of ‘embracers’ to provide training in VCT (e.g. adapting microskills to a different medium and using technology flexibly) may also dispel negative views held by psychologists regarding VCT and its effectiveness and consequently facilitate a wider adoption of VCT throughout Australia.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.