Attitudes and Ethics: Evaluating Knowledge and Regulatory Constructs in Planning Enforcement Practice

Abstract

The departure point for the paper is the need to scrutinize previously unconsidered dimensions which are fundamental to understanding the dynamics of the planning enforcement system. Drawing upon emerging themes in regulation theory the paper fuses these with knowledge constructs. The rationale is that the regulatory regimes must be informed by knowledge imparted from a range of sources and the resultant quality of decision making in pursuit of remedies is inextricably linked to the robustness of the evidence base collated. The theoretical analysis, coupled with radical legislative changes, provides a lens for an empirical investigation which scrutinizes tactics, strategies, operational mechanisms, attitudinal dimensions and ethics with a view to identifying the key factors impacting upon enforcement efficacy. Prizes and pitfalls are identified in the course of the analysis and evaluation, with evidence-based remedies suggested where appropriate. The paper concludes by reflecting on the importance of theoretical synergy and epistemological advancement, taking cognisance of ethical and attitudinal challenges facing the planning profession; and, brings to book those who flagrantly breach the Code of Professional Conduct.