Abstract
This quantitative study determines the values, beliefs, and attitudes influencing the intention of men to undergo or defer genetic testing for prostate cancer risk using a model based on components of the Theory of Reasoned Action and Health Belief Model. Telephone interviews of a community sample of 400 men in a large, East Coast metropolitan area of diverse educational, ethnic, and age backgrounds were conducted to rank key values and beliefs about genetic testing for prostate cancer risk in anticipation of its future availability. Descriptive statistics, univariate analyses, and logistic regression were used in data analysis. The factors of values attached to consequences, motivation from self, beliefs in benefits, and a motivation to comply with others (borderline) were statistically significant for testing intention. Of all demographics, only increased education was associated with diminished interest in testing. Desire to be tested varied widely across groups of men. Based on these identified values, health professionals can better understand men's values and beliefs on the risks and benefits of testing. The relationship of men to others, family and society, require further investigation in this and other aspects of genetic testing.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
