Abstract
Compressional‐ and shear‐wave attenuation data were calculated from sonic waveforms in three wells. The results show that at similar porosities and at in‐situ conditions, gas and condensate sandstone reservoirs exhibit higher P‐wave attenuation (lower P‐wave quality factor, [Formula: see text]) than either fully‐water or partially “oil + water” saturated sandstones. However, S‐wave attenuation and quality factor [Formula: see text] do not show such a strong dependence on pore fluids. Furthermore, [Formula: see text] indicates presence of gas or condensate, while [Formula: see text] indicates “full water” or “oil + water” saturation. These field data are consistent with laboratory data and theoretical predictions by various researchers. The crossovers of P-S‐wave attenuation and [Formula: see text] quality factors proved useful for distinguishing gas and condensate from oil and water reservoirs. They may be used in conjunction with [Formula: see text] and other logs as an aid in formation evaluation for the detection of gas, condensate, and oil. Several case studies in the literature report high P‐wave energy absorption at seismic frequencies below gas and condensate pools. This suggests that it is not unreasonable to assume that this method could also be used in seismic exploration as an aid for distinguishing gas and condensate from oil and water formations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
