Abstract

Perception of irony has been observed to be impaired in adults with autism spectrum disorder. In typically developed adults, the mismatch of verbal and nonverbal emotional cues can be perceived as an expression of irony even in the absence of any further contextual information. In this study, we evaluate to what extent high functioning autists perceive this incongruence as expressing irony. Our results show that incongruent verbal and nonverbal signals create an impression of irony significantly less often in participants with high-functioning autism than in typically developed control subjects. The extent of overall autistic symptomatology as measured with the autism-spectrum questionnaire (AQ), however, does not correlate with the reduced tendency to attribute incongruent stimuli as expressing irony. Therefore, the attenuation in irony attribution might rather be related to specific subdomains of autistic traits, such as a reduced tendency to interpret communicative signals in terms of complex intentional mental states. The observed differences in irony attribution support the assumption that a less pronounced tendency to engage in higher order mentalization processes might underlie the impairment of pragmatic language understanding in high functioning autism.

Highlights

  • Comprehension of figurative language is a momentous aspect of social interaction

  • The ANOVA did not reveal a significant difference between the autism spectrum disorders (ASD) group and the typically developed (TD) group across all stimuli (F(1, 38) = 0.8, p = 0.39, η2 = 0.02)

  • Our results indicate that incongruent verbal and nonverbal signals create an impression of irony significantly less often in participants with high-functioning autism than in typically developed control subjects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Comprehension of figurative language is a momentous aspect of social interaction. Figurative language is an umbrella term for all terms, idioms or utterances whose intended meaning differs from their literal meaning [1]. One type of figurative language is irony [2], which is generally defined as “the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaning” [3]. Irony is often used to fine-tune a message and can influence how positively or negatively an utterance is perceived. It has been shown that criticism expressed ironically is perceived less critically than criticism expressed literally [4].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call