Abstract

Early detection of danger is highly adaptive, yet fast orientation towards safety is also key to survival. This study aimed to explore how human brain searches for safety by manipulating subjects’ attentional set. Subjects were asked to judge random dots motion (RDM) direction and could be shocked for incorrect responses (RDM trials) while keeping alert in detecting shock probability cues (cue detection trials). Relative to safe condition, where attention was set to search cues associated with no shock, incorrect responses to ‘dangerous+’ cues would increase and correct responses to ‘dangerous−’ cues would decrease shock probability. In RDM trials, relative to the ‘dangerous+’, the safe and ‘dangerous−’ attentional set induced stronger activation in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), a core region involved in flexible threat assessment and safety signalling. In cue detection trials, shorter response times and greater accuracy were observed for ‘dangerous+’ than ‘dangerous−’ and safe cues. At neural level ‘dangerous+’ cues induced stronger activity in the frontoparietal attention network than safe cues. Overall, our findings demonstrate that attentional set for searching safety recruits the vmPFC, while detection of threat-related cues elicits activity in the frontoparietal attention network, suggesting new roles for these regions in human defensive survival circuitry.

Highlights

  • Detection of danger is highly adaptive, yet fast orientation towards safety is key to survival

  • The present study investigated how the human brain is organized to search for safe vs. dangerous cues using a novel random dots motion (RDM) paradigm combined with threat of electric shocks and whether this process varied as a function of the level of task difficulty

  • Results on ratings showed that subjects tended to be more confident and less anxious in searching the safe relative to the dangerous cues where they could be shocked for incorrect responses

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Detection of danger is highly adaptive, yet fast orientation towards safety is key to survival. In RDM trials, relative to the ‘dangerous+’, the safe and ‘dangerous−’ attentional set induced stronger activation in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), a core region involved in flexible threat assessment and safety signalling. Our findings demonstrate that attentional set for searching safety recruits the vmPFC, while detection of threat-related cues elicits activity in the frontoparietal attention network, suggesting new roles for these regions in human defensive survival circuitry. The ‘reactive fear’ circuitry, encompassing the midbrain and hypothalamus, will be evoked to initiate fast reactions such as freezing or fleeing[14,17,18] These two circuits switch between each other according to the spatial distance to threat and can optimize defensive responses. This hypothesis can be supported by findings that the vmPFC, which is a core hub of the ‘cognitive fear’ circuitry, is involved in both the learned safety and safety signaling[21,22,23,24,25,26]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call